Home > California Lawyers > Palo-Alto, CA Lawyers > Richard C. Lin at Banys, P.C.

Richard C. Lin, Managing Attorney Attorney
Intellectual Property; Patent Litigation; Trade Secret and Non-Competition; Federal Circuit Appellate; Intellectual Property & Antitrust...
Phone:650-308-8505
Web:http://www.banyspc.com
Address: 2200 Geng Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA 94303
  1. Profile
  2. Lawyers Nearby
  3. Customer Reviews

Law Firm:Banys, P.C.
Lawyer:Richard C. Lin
Phone:650-308-8505
Fax:
Lawyer Title:Managing Attorney
Practice Areas:Intellectual Property; Patent Litigation; Trade Secret and Non-Competition; Federal Circuit Appellate; Intellectual Property & Antitrust Interface; US ITC & Section 337
Bio:Richard Lin specializes in intellectual property litigation. He has represented clients in patent, antitrust, trade secret, copyright, and trademark disputes. His litigation experience has involved a wide range of technologies including wireless devices, LCD power conversion circuitry, distributed computing systems, EDA software, medical devices, and biotechnology. Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Lin served as a law clerk to the Honorable Charles F. Eick in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Mr. Lin also worked as an associate at the law firm of Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder LLP, where his practice focused on intellectual property and antitrust litigation. Representative Highlights · In the Matter of Certain Cold Cathode Fluorescent Lamp ("CCFL") Inverter Circuits and Products Containing Same. Represent O2 Micro in International Trade Commission investigation against multiple parties involving CCFL inverter circuits. · O2 Micro Int'l Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Tech. Co., Ltd. Represent O2 Micro in patent infringement action involving power conversion and protection circuitry for LCD screens. Case pending following completion of bench trial. · O2 Micro Int'l Ltd. v. Rohm Co., Ltd. Represented O2 Micro in patent infringement action involving power regulation circuitry for LCD screens. Case settled on fourth day of trial. · Negotiated Data Solutions LLC v. Dell Inc. Represented Intel in patent infringement action involving systems
Admitted:2000, California; United States District Court for the Southern District of California; United States District Court for the Northern District of California; United States District Court for the Central District of California; United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit; United States Patent and Trademark Office
College:Stanford University, A.B., Psychology, with distinction, 1996; Stanford University, B.S., Biology, 1997
Law School:Harvard Law School, J.D., 2000
Membership:
Web:http://www.banyspc.com
Languages:English
Email:rcl(at)banyspc.com

Lawyer Richard C. Lin, graduated from Stanford University, A.B., Psychology, with distinction, 1996; Stanford University, B.S., Biology, 1997 Harvard Law School, J.D., 2000, is now employed by Banys, P.C. at 2200 Geng Road, Suite 200 Palo Alto, CA 94303.Richard C. Lin is one of the more than one million lawyers in United States. Before choosing Richard C. Lin as your lawyer, you should consider whether Richard C. Lin offers free consultation, (if not) how much the initial interview costs, if there is any hidden attorney fees, what's the fee schedule, whether he or she has good community reputation and is able to provide a list of good references. You can also contact the Board of Professional Responsibility of the state bar, to find out if Richard C. Lin has ever been placed under any disciplinary actions. Please be aware that, though Richard C. Lin's office is located at Palo Alto, CA, he or she might belong to the bar association of other states.

You should also ask how long the lawyer has been in practice, how much experience he or she has in cases like yours, and more importantly, the outcomes of those cases! Focus of the lawyer's practice and years of experience are also very important factors in your evaluation process. The more focused the lawyer's practice areas, the better service he or she could provide. So do not make decisions solely on one or two factors. Only hire lawyers you feel comfortable with as they will represent you and your interests, and you will be sharing private details about your life with them.

Richard C. Lin has been admitted in 2000, California; United States District Court for the Southern District of California; United States District Court for the Northern District of California; United States District Court for the Central District of California; United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit; United States Patent and Trademark Office. His or her practice areas include Intellectual Property; Patent Litigation; Trade Secret and Non-Competition; Federal Circuit Appellate; Intellectual Property & Antitrust Interface; US ITC & Section 337.

Richard C. Lin's college and law school education includes Stanford University, A.B., Psychology, with distinction, 1996; Stanford University, B.S., Biology, 1997, Harvard Law School, J.D., 2000. Other biographical background includes Richard Lin specializes in intellectual property litigation. He has represented clients in patent, antitrust, trade secret, copyright, and trademark disputes. His litigation experience has involved a wide range of technologies including wireless devices, LCD power conversion circuitry, distributed computing systems, EDA software, medical devices, and biotechnology. Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Lin served as a law clerk to the Honorable Charles F. Eick in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Mr. Lin also worked as an associate at the law firm of Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder LLP, where his practice focused on intellectual property and antitrust litigation. Representative Highlights · In the Matter of Certain Cold Cathode Fluorescent Lamp ("CCFL") Inverter Circuits and Products Containing Same. Represent O2 Micro in International Trade Commission investigation against multiple parties involving CCFL inverter circuits. · O2 Micro Int'l Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Tech. Co., Ltd. Represent O2 Micro in patent infringement action involving power conversion and protection circuitry for LCD screens. Case pending following completion of bench trial. · O2 Micro Int'l Ltd. v. Rohm Co., Ltd. Represented O2 Micro in patent infringement action involving power regulation circuitry for LCD screens. Case settled on fourth day of trial. · Negotiated Data Solutions LLC v. Dell Inc. Represented Intel in patent infringement action involving systems. You should contact other lawyers and law firms nearby before choosing your legal representatives.

This profile has been verified by Banys, P.C.. If you have any questions, please contact us. If you want to add your attorney firm, please create a new account.




LawyerDB.org © 2012-2024 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact Us | About Us