Home > Delaware Lawyers > Wilmington, DE Lawyers > David A. Jenkins at Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP

David A. Jenkins, Partner Attorney
Chancery/Corporate Litigation, Corporate and Alternative Entity Counseling
Phone:888-388-4830, 302-504-1654
Web:http://www.skjlaw.com
Address: Brandywine Building, 1000 West Street, Suite 1501, Wilmington, DE 19899
  1. Profile
  2. Lawyers Nearby
  3. Customer Reviews

Law Firm:Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP
Lawyer:David A. Jenkins
Phone:888-388-4830, 302-504-1654
Fax:302-652-8405
Lawyer Title:Partner
Practice Areas:Chancery/Corporate Litigation, Corporate and Alternative Entity Counseling
Bio:David's practice is focused on corporate litigation, on both plaintiffs' and defendants' behalf. Some recent examples of cases that resulted in a decision are:Lead counsel in derivative and class action lawsuitsS.I. Management, L.P. v. Wininger, 707 A.2d 37 (Del. 1998) in which the Supreme Court upheld an injunction issued by the Court of Chancery preventing the liquidation of a limited partnership and Smith v. Nu-West Industries, Inc., C.A. No. 15442, 2000 WL 1641248 (Del. Ch. Oct. 25, 2000) in which the Court of Chancery, affirmed by the Supreme Court (781 A.2d 695 (Del. 2001)), determined that the class of preferred stockholders had been wrongfully deprived of part of the accrued dividends to which they were entitled.Breach of Fiduciary DutyGentile v. Rossette, 906 A.2d 91 (2006), in which the Delaware Supreme Court (on an interlocutory appeal) reversed a grant of summary judgment against plaintiffs, resulting in a clarification of the direct/derivative claim distinction.Appraisal CasesGentile v. SinglePoint Financial, Inc., C.A. No. 18677, 2003 WL 1240504 (Del. Ch. Mar. 5, 2003), in which the plaintiff stockholders received almost double the merger price and Borruso v. Communications Telesystems International, 753 A.2d 451 (Del. Ch. 1999) in which plaintiffs obtained over 30 times the merger consideration.Disputes Over Control of a Company or Other EntityGodsy v. Gruenberg, C.A. No. 20190 (Del. Ch. Apr. 22, 2003) (TRANSCRIPT) and Rohe v. Reliance Training Networ
Admitted:1978, Delaware; United States District Court for the District of Delaware; United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit; United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit;
College:University of Pennsylvania, B.A., cum laude, 1975
Law School:University of Chicago, J.D., 1978
Membership: Associations, Delaware State Bar Association Member, Council of Corporation Law Section
Web:http://www.skjlaw.com
Languages:English

Lawyer David A. Jenkins, graduated from University of Pennsylvania, B.A., cum laude, 1975 University of Chicago, J.D., 1978, is now employed by Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP at Brandywine Building, 1000 West Street, Suite 1501 Wilmington, DE 19899.

While being a member of Associations, Delaware State Bar Association Member, Council of Corporation Law Section, David A. Jenkins is one of the more than one million lawyers in United States. Before choosing David A. Jenkins as your lawyer, you should consider whether David A. Jenkins offers free consultation, (if not) how much the initial interview costs, if there is any hidden attorney fees, what's the fee schedule, whether he or she has good community reputation and is able to provide a list of good references. You can also contact the Board of Professional Responsibility of the state bar, to find out if David A. Jenkins has ever been placed under any disciplinary actions. Please be aware that, though David A. Jenkins's office is located at Wilmington, DE, he or she might belong to the bar association of other states.

You should also ask how long the lawyer has been in practice, how much experience he or she has in cases like yours, and more importantly, the outcomes of those cases! Focus of the lawyer's practice and years of experience are also very important factors in your evaluation process. The more focused the lawyer's practice areas, the better service he or she could provide. So do not make decisions solely on one or two factors. Only hire lawyers you feel comfortable with as they will represent you and your interests, and you will be sharing private details about your life with them.

David A. Jenkins has been admitted in 1978, Delaware; United States District Court for the District of Delaware; United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit; United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit;. His or her practice areas include Chancery/Corporate Litigation, Corporate and Alternative Entity Counseling.

David A. Jenkins's college and law school education includes University of Pennsylvania, B.A., cum laude, 1975, University of Chicago, J.D., 1978. Other biographical background includes David's practice is focused on corporate litigation, on both plaintiffs' and defendants' behalf. Some recent examples of cases that resulted in a decision are:Lead counsel in derivative and class action lawsuitsS.I. Management, L.P. v. Wininger, 707 A.2d 37 (Del. 1998) in which the Supreme Court upheld an injunction issued by the Court of Chancery preventing the liquidation of a limited partnership and Smith v. Nu-West Industries, Inc., C.A. No. 15442, 2000 WL 1641248 (Del. Ch. Oct. 25, 2000) in which the Court of Chancery, affirmed by the Supreme Court (781 A.2d 695 (Del. 2001)), determined that the class of preferred stockholders had been wrongfully deprived of part of the accrued dividends to which they were entitled.Breach of Fiduciary DutyGentile v. Rossette, 906 A.2d 91 (2006), in which the Delaware Supreme Court (on an interlocutory appeal) reversed a grant of summary judgment against plaintiffs, resulting in a clarification of the direct/derivative claim distinction.Appraisal CasesGentile v. SinglePoint Financial, Inc., C.A. No. 18677, 2003 WL 1240504 (Del. Ch. Mar. 5, 2003), in which the plaintiff stockholders received almost double the merger price and Borruso v. Communications Telesystems International, 753 A.2d 451 (Del. Ch. 1999) in which plaintiffs obtained over 30 times the merger consideration.Disputes Over Control of a Company or Other EntityGodsy v. Gruenberg, C.A. No. 20190 (Del. Ch. Apr. 22, 2003) (TRANSCRIPT) and Rohe v. Reliance Training Networ. You should contact other lawyers and law firms nearby before choosing your legal representatives.

If you are the owner or employee of Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, and want to update the information, please create a new account and then Claim & Edit Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP. If you want to add your attorney firm, please create a new account.




LawyerDB.org © 2012-2024 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact Us | About Us