William D. Grand, Lawyer at Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP

William D. Grand, Of Counsel Attorney
Complex Commercial Litigation, Legal Malpractice Defense, Theft of Trade Secrets, Noncompete Litigation, Environmental Litigation, Breac...

Phone:732-476-2520
Address: 1700 Broadway, 28th floor, New York, NY 10019

Law Firm:	Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP
Lawyer:	William D. Grand
Phone:	732-476-2520
Fax:	732-476-2521
Lawyer Title:	Of Counsel
Practice Areas:	Complex Commercial Litigation, Legal Malpractice Defense, Theft of Trade Secrets, Noncompete Litigation, Environmental Litigation, Breach of Contract, Condemnation, Eminent Domain, Real Estate Litigation
Bio:	Representative Cases: Harrington, et al v. Director, Division of Taxation, et al. Mr. Grand defended the plaintiffs in this case, a group of former co-workers who won a $216 million jackpot in New Jersey's Mega Millions lottery contest. When the plaintiffs purchased the winning ticket and received their winnings, New… Read more Harrington, et al v. Director, Division of Taxation, et al. Mr. Grand defended the plaintiffs in this case, a group of former co-workers who won a $216 million jackpot in New Jersey's Mega Millions lottery contest. When the plaintiffs purchased the winning ticket and received their winnings, New Jersey law exempted lottery winnings from state income tax, however months later the State changed the rules and attempted to retroactively tax lottery winnings. The Tax Court granted partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs, holding that the State had failed to turn “square corners” in dealing with the plaintiffs. The Geon Company v. Cary Compounds. Multi-national corporation brought an action against a New Jersey company for damages for alleged misappropriation of its formulas and trade secrets. Grand obtained a no cause judgment after six weeks of trial. * G & W Laboratories v. Able Laboratories. Pharmaceutical manufacturer sued another pharmaceutical company for alleged theft of formulas and trade secrets. Grand defended the Complaint and plaintiff dropped its case after five weeks of trial. *** Middl
Admitted:	1972, New Jersey; 1972, U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey; 1978, New York; 1983, U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit; 1987, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York; 1987, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York; 1992, U.S. Supreme Court; 1998, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit;
College:
Law School:
Membership:	- Member, New Jersey State Bar Association- Member, American Bar Association Section of Litigation- Former Master of the John J. Gibbons Inn of Court for Federal Trial Practice and Intellectual Property.
Web:
Languages:	English

Lawyer William D. Grand, graduated from , is now employed by Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP at 1700 Broadway, 28th floor New York, NY 10019.

While being a member of - Member, New Jersey State Bar Association- Member, American Bar Association Section of Litigation- Former Master of the John J. Gibbons Inn of Court for Federal Trial Practice and Intellectual Property., William D. Grand is one of the more than one million lawyers in United States. Before choosing William D. Grand as your lawyer, you should consider whether William D. Grand offers free consultation, (if not) how much the initial interview costs, if there is any hidden attorney fees, what's the fee schedule, whether he or she has good community reputation and is able to provide a list of good references. You can also contact the Board of Professional Responsibility of the state bar, to find out if William D. Grand has ever been placed under any disciplinary actions. Please be aware that, though William D. Grand's office is located at New York, NY, he or she might belong to the bar association of other states.

You should also ask how long the lawyer has been in practice, how much experience he or she has in cases like yours, and more importantly, the outcomes of those cases! Focus of the lawyer's practice and years of experience are also very important factors in your evaluation process. The more focused the lawyer's practice areas, the better service he or she could provide. So do not make decisions solely on one or two factors. Only hire lawyers you feel comfortable with as they will represent you and your interests, and you will be sharing private details about your life with them.

William D. Grand has been admitted in 1972, New Jersey; 1972, U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey; 1978, New York; 1983, U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit; 1987, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York; 1987, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York; 1992, U.S. Supreme Court; 1998, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit;. His or her practice areas include Complex Commercial Litigation, Legal Malpractice Defense, Theft of Trade Secrets, Noncompete Litigation, Environmental Litigation, Breach of Contract, Condemnation, Eminent Domain, Real Estate Litigation.

William D. Grand's college and law school education includes , . Other biographical background includes Representative Cases: ** Harrington, et al v. Director, Division of Taxation, et al. Mr. Grand defended the plaintiffs in this case, a group of former co-workers who won a $216 million jackpot in New Jersey's Mega Millions lottery contest. When the plaintiffs purchased the winning ticket and received their winnings, New… Read more ** Harrington, et al v. Director, Division of Taxation, et al. Mr. Grand defended the plaintiffs in this case, a group of former co-workers who won a $216 million jackpot in New Jersey's Mega Millions lottery contest. When the plaintiffs purchased the winning ticket and received their winnings, New Jersey law exempted lottery winnings from state income tax, however months later the State changed the rules and attempted to retroactively tax lottery winnings. The Tax Court granted partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs, holding that the State had failed to turn “square corners” in dealing with the plaintiffs. ** The Geon Company v. Cary Compounds. Multi-national corporation brought an action against a New Jersey company for damages for alleged misappropriation of its formulas and trade secrets. Grand obtained a no cause judgment after six weeks of trial. *** G & W Laboratories v. Able Laboratories. Pharmaceutical manufacturer sued another pharmaceutical company for alleged theft of formulas and trade secrets. Grand defended the Complaint and plaintiff dropped its case after five weeks of trial. *** Middl. You should contact other lawyers and law firms nearby before choosing your legal representatives.

If you are the owner or employee of Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, and want to update the information, please create a new account and then Claim & Edit Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP. If you want to add your attorney firm, please create a new account.