Lawyer Kevin M. Littman, graduated from
Tufts University, B.S., magna cum laude UCLA School of Law, J.D. Order of the Coif, Managing Editor, UCLA Law Review, is now employed by Foley & Lardner LLP at
111 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02199.Kevin M. Littman is one of the more than one million lawyers in United States. Before choosing Kevin M. Littman as your lawyer, you should consider whether Kevin M. Littman offers free consultation, (if not) how much the initial interview costs, if there is any hidden attorney fees, what's the fee schedule, whether he or she has good community reputation and is able to provide a list of good references. You can also contact the Board of Professional Responsibility of the state bar, to find out if Kevin M. Littman has ever been placed under any disciplinary actions. Please be aware that, though Kevin M. Littman's office is located at Boston, MA, he or she might belong to the bar association of other states.
You should also ask how long the lawyer has been in practice, how much experience he or she has in cases like yours, and more importantly, the outcomes of those cases! Focus of the lawyer's practice and years of experience are also very important factors in your evaluation process. The more focused the lawyer's practice areas, the better service he or she could provide. So do not make decisions solely on one or two factors. Only hire lawyers you feel comfortable with as they will represent you and your interests, and you will be sharing private details about your life with them.
Kevin M. Littman has been admitted in 2000, Massachusetts; 2002, New York; State and Federal Courts in Massachusetts; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. His or her practice areas include Business Method & Software Patents; IP Litigation; Patent Litigation; Trademark, Copyright & Advertising Litigation.
Kevin M. Littman's college and law school education includes Tufts University, B.S., magna cum laude, UCLA School of Law, J.D. Order of the Coif, Managing Editor, UCLA Law Review. Other biographical background includes Representative Experience • Oasis Research, LLC v. Adrive, LLC, et. al. Represented Carbonite in the Eastern District of Texas against a claim brought by Oasis Research, LLC, a non-practicing entity that was formed for the purposes of enforcing the patents. We secured a separate jury trial on inventorship issues, in advance of resolution of the other liability issues in the case. In March 2013, we secured a jury verdict for Carbonite that each of the four asserted patents is invalid. • Cognex v. MVTec. Represented 18 of 22 respondents in a three patent ITC investigation concerning machine vision software filed by Cognex Corporation. Cognex had initially sued MVTec on nine patents in the District Court of Massachusetts, all relating to machine vision and in particular methods for finding objects in a digital image. After MVTec threw all of the patents into reexamination, Cognex filed an ITC action on three of the nine patents. Cognex was forced to withdraw its claims on one of those patents during discovery and the remaining two went to trial before Judge Charneski at the ITC. Based on eight days of trial testimony (and extensive post-trial briefing), Judge Charneski found that no claims were infringed and that all of the asserted claims were invalid. In December 2013, the Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC's finding of no infringement of the one surviving patent (the other having been invalidated by Foley in the PTO while the appeal was pending), and not r. You should contact other
lawyers and law firms nearby before choosing your legal representatives.
If you are the owner or employee of Foley & Lardner LLP, and want to update the information, please
create a new account and then
Claim & Edit Foley & Lardner LLP. If you want to add your attorney firm, please
create a new account.