Rate and Review Ross P. Schreiter

---

- Representation Lacked Urgency and Follow-Through in a Complex Divorce Case - - Christopher - 12/7/2025 - flag as inappropriate - comment
I retained this lawyer from an Illinois firm for a complex Illinois divorce involving significant marital assets, financial irregularities, and safety concerns. My experience with the representation was deeply disappointing, and I believe it is important to share my perspective so others can make informed decisions. During my time as a client, several issues significantly affected the outcome of my case: Delays in critical filings: Key discovery deadlines passed without action, and my discovery materials were not sent to the opposing party for approximately three months. Lack of timely financial investigation: Despite early documentation of substantial financial discrepancies and missing records, subpoenas and motions that could have protected marital assets were not pursued with urgency. Long periods without communication: I experienced extended gaps—sometimes weeks—without updates, even during pivotal stages of the case. Missed court event: A pre-trial conference was missed, which further contributed to delays. Insufficient use of documentation I provided: I supplied detailed financial analyses and evidence of irregularities, but these materials were not incorporated into motions or court strategy in a way that meaningfully advanced my position. Pushback against inaccurate claims: Opposing counsel made several repeated false income claims, inflating my salary over the years to position her client into a favorable position to receive maintenance. These claims were not refuted with factual evidence provided, but rather allowed to remain and set the narrative with the court. Transition issues: When my attorney left the firm, there was no advance notice, and the handoff of my case was incomplete. My new counsel later noted missing components of my file. As a result of these cumulative issues, my case progressed without the financial clarity or asset protection that were available had timely legal steps been taken. The final settlement was shaped by incomplete discovery and the absence of key financial information, and it has had lasting and devestating consequences for my family and personal financial stability and long-term security. I am sharing this review not to assign motives or make personal attacks, but to describe the service I received and the impact it had on my life. I encourage anyone considering representation in a complex or high-conflict divorce to ask detailed questions about discovery strategy, communication practices, asset-protection procedures, and transition planning within the firm.

---

- Representation Lacked Urgency and Follow-Through in a Complex Divorce Case - - Christopher - 12/7/2025 - flag as inappropriate - comment
I retained this lawyer from an Illinois firm for a complex Illinois divorce involving significant marital assets, financial irregularities, and safety concerns. My experience with the representation was deeply disappointing, and I believe it is important to share my perspective so others can make informed decisions. During my time as a client, several issues significantly affected the outcome of my case: Delays in critical filings: Key discovery deadlines passed without action, and my discovery materials were not sent to the opposing party for approximately three months. Lack of timely financial investigation: Despite early documentation of substantial financial discrepancies and missing records, subpoenas and motions that could have protected marital assets were not pursued with urgency. Long periods without communication: I experienced extended gaps—sometimes weeks—without updates, even during pivotal stages of the case. Missed court event: A pre-trial conference was missed, which further contributed to delays. Insufficient use of documentation I provided: I supplied detailed financial analyses and evidence of irregularities, but these materials were not incorporated into motions or court strategy in a way that meaningfully advanced my position. Pushback against inaccurate claims: Opposing counsel made several repeated false income claims, inflating my salary over the years to position her client into a favorable position to receive maintenance. These claims were not refuted with factual evidence provided, but rather allowed to remain and set the narrative with the court. Transition issues: When my attorney left the firm, there was no advance notice, and the handoff of my case was incomplete. My new counsel later noted missing components of my file. As a result of these cumulative issues, my case progressed without the financial clarity or asset protection that were available had timely legal steps been taken. The final settlement was shaped by incomplete discovery and the absence of key financial information, and it has had lasting and devestating consequences for my family and personal financial stability and long-term security. I am sharing this review not to assign motives or make personal attacks, but to describe the service I received and the impact it had on my life. I encourage anyone considering representation in a complex or high-conflict divorce to ask detailed questions about discovery strategy, communication practices, asset-protection procedures, and transition planning within the firm.