Charles A. Mollis, Lawyer at Mollis & Mollis, Inc.

Charles A. Mollis, Member Attorney
Estate Planning, Trusts, Wills and Related Documents, Tax Planning and Advanced Estate Planning, Business Succession Planning, Probate L...

Phone:949-889-0896
Address: 3146 Red Hill Avenue, Suite 100, Costa Mesa, CA 92626

Law Firm:	Mollis & Mollis, Inc.
Lawyer:	Charles A. Mollis
Phone:	949-889-0896
Fax:
Lawyer Title:	Member
Practice Areas:	Estate Planning, Trusts, Wills and Related Documents, Tax Planning and Advanced Estate Planning, Business Succession Planning, Probate Litigation, Probate, Trust and Estate Litigation, Will or Trust Contests, Allegations of a Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Trust termination and Modification Proceedings, Objections to Accountings, Lawsuits Seeking to Remove or Substitute a Trustee or Executor, Business Law, Business Formation, Partnerships (including General, Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Partnerships), Corporations (including S Corporations and C Corporations), Limited Liability Companies, Business Transactions, Succession Planning, Real Estate, Lease, Purchase and Sale Agreements, Easements, Boundary Disputes, Title Disputes, Transfer Disputes, Business Litigation, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Construction Disputes, Contract Disputes, Corporation Disputes, Partnership Disputes, Employment Disputes, Environmental Law, Insurance Litigation, Lender Liability, Real Estate Litigation, Taxation Issues, Tax, Gift Taxation, Estate Taxation, Income Taxation, Generation-Skipping Transfer Taxes, Step-Up in Basis for Capital Gains Tax Purposes, Real Property Taxes, Property Taxes
Bio:	Mr. Charles A Mollis received his Juris Doctor at Western State University. He is active in the local legal community. His professional honors include receiving the “American Jurisprudence Award” in Corporations. In addition, Mr. Mollis has had two published cases. The first case, Nanfito v. Superior Court (1991), 2 Cal. App. 4th 315: 2 C.R. 2nd 876, Mr. Mollis represented the defendant who had presented a motion to dismiss after plaintiff had elected arbitration just prior to running of the five-year statute. The court refused to hear defendant’s motion and ruled that, with plaintiff’s arbitration election, it stripped the court of jurisdiction to rule. The Appeals Court reversed the trial court in defendant’s favor and ordered the lower court to hear the motion and that it had retained jurisdiction and should have refused plaintiff’s election so close to the running of the statute of limitations. The second case J.C. Gury Company v. Nippon Carbide Industries (USA) Inc., (2007) 152 Cal. App. 4th 1300, Mr. Mollis represented the plaintiff that had won an arbitration award, which had been upheld by the trial court. Defendant appealed stating that the arbitrator had exceeded his authority when he found contract provisions unconscionable. Both parties had submitted on the issue of unconscionability to arbitration. The Appeals Court, in favor of the plaintiff, ruled that defendant had submitted on the issue and he could not argue that an adverse decision exceeded the ar
Admitted:	1985, California; 1986, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California; 1986, U.S. District Court, Central District of California; 1986, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California; 1986, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California; 1986, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth… Read more 1985, California; 1986, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California; 1986, U.S. District Court, Central District of California; 1986, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California; 1986, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California; 1986, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 1986, U.S. Court of Federal Claims; 1986, U.S. Tax Court; 1989, U.S. Supreme Court; 2021, Texas; Read less
College:	California State University at Long Beach, Class of 1980, B.A., with honors
Law School:	Western State University, Class of 1985, J.D.
Membership:
Web:
Languages:	English

Lawyer Charles A. Mollis, graduated from California State University at Long Beach, Class of 1980, B.A., with honors Western State University, Class of 1985, J.D., is now employed by Mollis & Mollis, Inc. at 3146 Red Hill Avenue, Suite 100 Costa Mesa, CA 92626.Charles A. Mollis is one of the more than one million lawyers in United States. Before choosing Charles A. Mollis as your lawyer, you should consider whether Charles A. Mollis offers free consultation, (if not) how much the initial interview costs, if there is any hidden attorney fees, what's the fee schedule, whether he or she has good community reputation and is able to provide a list of good references. You can also contact the Board of Professional Responsibility of the state bar, to find out if Charles A. Mollis has ever been placed under any disciplinary actions. Please be aware that, though Charles A. Mollis's office is located at Costa Mesa, CA, he or she might belong to the bar association of other states.

You should also ask how long the lawyer has been in practice, how much experience he or she has in cases like yours, and more importantly, the outcomes of those cases! Focus of the lawyer's practice and years of experience are also very important factors in your evaluation process. The more focused the lawyer's practice areas, the better service he or she could provide. So do not make decisions solely on one or two factors. Only hire lawyers you feel comfortable with as they will represent you and your interests, and you will be sharing private details about your life with them.

Charles A. Mollis has been admitted in 1985, California; 1986, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California; 1986, U.S. District Court, Central District of California; 1986, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California; 1986, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California; 1986, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth… Read more 1985, California; 1986, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California; 1986, U.S. District Court, Central District of California; 1986, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California; 1986, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California; 1986, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 1986, U.S. Court of Federal Claims; 1986, U.S. Tax Court; 1989, U.S. Supreme Court; 2021, Texas; Read less. His or her practice areas include Estate Planning, Trusts, Wills and Related Documents, Tax Planning and Advanced Estate Planning, Business Succession Planning, Probate Litigation, Probate, Trust and Estate Litigation, Will or Trust Contests, Allegations of a Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Trust termination and Modification Proceedings, Objections to Accountings, Lawsuits Seeking to Remove or Substitute a Trustee or Executor, Business Law, Business Formation, Partnerships (including General, Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Partnerships), Corporations (including S Corporations and C Corporations), Limited Liability Companies, Business Transactions, Succession Planning, Real Estate, Lease, Purchase and Sale Agreements, Easements, Boundary Disputes, Title Disputes, Transfer Disputes, Business Litigation, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Construction Disputes, Contract Disputes, Corporation Disputes, Partnership Disputes, Employment Disputes, Environmental Law, Insurance Litigation, Lender Liability, Real Estate Litigation, Taxation Issues, Tax, Gift Taxation, Estate Taxation, Income Taxation, Generation-Skipping Transfer Taxes, Step-Up in Basis for Capital Gains Tax Purposes, Real Property Taxes, Property Taxes.

Charles A. Mollis's college and law school education includes California State University at Long Beach, Class of 1980, B.A., with honors, Western State University, Class of 1985, J.D.. Other biographical background includes Mr. Charles A Mollis received his Juris Doctor at Western State University. He is active in the local legal community. His professional honors include receiving the “American Jurisprudence Award” in Corporations. In addition, Mr. Mollis has had two published cases. The first case, Nanfito v. Superior Court (1991), 2 Cal. App. 4th 315: 2 C.R. 2nd 876, Mr. Mollis represented the defendant who had presented a motion to dismiss after plaintiff had elected arbitration just prior to running of the five-year statute. The court refused to hear defendant’s motion and ruled that, with plaintiff’s arbitration election, it stripped the court of jurisdiction to rule. The Appeals Court reversed the trial court in defendant’s favor and ordered the lower court to hear the motion and that it had retained jurisdiction and should have refused plaintiff’s election so close to the running of the statute of limitations. The second case J.C. Gury Company v. Nippon Carbide Industries (USA) Inc., (2007) 152 Cal. App. 4th 1300, Mr. Mollis represented the plaintiff that had won an arbitration award, which had been upheld by the trial court. Defendant appealed stating that the arbitrator had exceeded his authority when he found contract provisions unconscionable. Both parties had submitted on the issue of unconscionability to arbitration. The Appeals Court, in favor of the plaintiff, ruled that defendant had submitted on the issue and he could not argue that an adverse decision exceeded the ar. You should contact other lawyers and law firms nearby before choosing your legal representatives.

If you are the owner or employee of Mollis & Mollis, Inc., and want to update the information, please create a new account and then Claim & Edit Mollis & Mollis, Inc.. If you want to add your attorney firm, please create a new account.