Home > New York Lawyers > New-York, NY Lawyers > Mr. Jonathan R. Ratchik at Kramer, Dunleavy & Ratchik, PLLC

Mr. Jonathan R. Ratchik, Partner Attorney
Automobile Accidents, Slip and Fall, Medical Malpractice, Premises Liability, Elevator Liability, Construction Accidents, Pedestrian Inj...
Phone:347-960-3317
Address: 61 Broadway, Suite 2220, New York, NY 10006
  1. Profile
  2. Lawyers Nearby
  3. Customer Reviews

Law Firm:Kramer, Dunleavy & Ratchik, PLLC
Lawyer:Mr. Jonathan R. Ratchik
Phone:347-960-3317
Fax:
Lawyer Title:Partner
Practice Areas:Automobile Accidents, Slip and Fall, Medical Malpractice, Premises Liability, Elevator Liability, Construction Accidents, Pedestrian Injuries
Bio:Representative Cases: Manhattan by Sail, Inc. v. Tagle, 873 F.3d 177 (2d Cir. 2017)(reversing judgment in favor of petitioner and directing verdict in favor of respondent, a young mother of two who suffered a traumatic brain injury after getting struck in the head by metal clip while on board petitioner’s… Read more Manhattan by Sail, Inc. v. Tagle, 873 F.3d 177 (2d Cir. 2017)(reversing judgment in favor of petitioner and directing verdict in favor of respondent, a young mother of two who suffered a traumatic brain injury after getting struck in the head by metal clip while on board petitioner’s sailboat) Waxman v. Hallen Const. Co. Inc.,139 A.D.3d 597 (1st Dep’t 2016)(reversing order granting defendant’s summary judgment motion which was untimely and where issues of fact whether defendant created dangerous roadway condition that caused plaintiff’s motor scooter crash) Uncyk v. Cedarhurst Prop. Mgmt.,LLC, 137 A.D.3d 610 (1st Dep’t 2016)(reversing order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment where issues of fact as to whether defendant had constructive notice of dangerous sidewalk condition that caused elderly woman’s fall) Nakasato v. 331 W. 51st Corp.,124 A.D.3d 522 (1st Dep’t 2015)(affirming plaintiff’s post-trial motion to set aside jury verdict in favor of defendants on the grounds that verdict represented impermissible compromise) Higgins v. West 50th Street Assoc., LLC, 94 A.D.3d 52
Admitted:1998, New York; 2002, United States District Court, Southern District of New York; 2002, United States District Court, Eastern District of New York; 2016, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit;
College:New York University, Class of 1994, B.A., cum laude
Law School:American University, Washington College of Law, Class of 1997, J.D.
Membership:Associations & Memberships: New York State Trial Lawyers Association New York State Bar Association New York City Bar Association
Web:
Languages:English

Lawyer Mr. Jonathan R. Ratchik, graduated from New York University, Class of 1994, B.A., cum laude American University, Washington College of Law, Class of 1997, J.D., is now employed by Kramer, Dunleavy & Ratchik, PLLC at 61 Broadway, Suite 2220 New York, NY 10006.

While being a member of Associations & Memberships: New York State Trial Lawyers Association New York State Bar Association New York City Bar Association, Mr. Jonathan R. Ratchik is one of the more than one million lawyers in United States. Before choosing Mr. Jonathan R. Ratchik as your lawyer, you should consider whether Mr. Jonathan R. Ratchik offers free consultation, (if not) how much the initial interview costs, if there is any hidden attorney fees, what's the fee schedule, whether he or she has good community reputation and is able to provide a list of good references. You can also contact the Board of Professional Responsibility of the state bar, to find out if Mr. Jonathan R. Ratchik has ever been placed under any disciplinary actions. Please be aware that, though Mr. Jonathan R. Ratchik's office is located at New York, NY, he or she might belong to the bar association of other states.

You should also ask how long the lawyer has been in practice, how much experience he or she has in cases like yours, and more importantly, the outcomes of those cases! Focus of the lawyer's practice and years of experience are also very important factors in your evaluation process. The more focused the lawyer's practice areas, the better service he or she could provide. So do not make decisions solely on one or two factors. Only hire lawyers you feel comfortable with as they will represent you and your interests, and you will be sharing private details about your life with them.

Mr. Jonathan R. Ratchik has been admitted in 1998, New York; 2002, United States District Court, Southern District of New York; 2002, United States District Court, Eastern District of New York; 2016, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit;. His or her practice areas include Automobile Accidents, Slip and Fall, Medical Malpractice, Premises Liability, Elevator Liability, Construction Accidents, Pedestrian Injuries.

Mr. Jonathan R. Ratchik's college and law school education includes New York University, Class of 1994, B.A., cum laude, American University, Washington College of Law, Class of 1997, J.D.. Other biographical background includes Representative Cases: Manhattan by Sail, Inc. v. Tagle, 873 F.3d 177 (2d Cir. 2017)(reversing judgment in favor of petitioner and directing verdict in favor of respondent, a young mother of two who suffered a traumatic brain injury after getting struck in the head by metal clip while on board petitioner’s… Read more Manhattan by Sail, Inc. v. Tagle, 873 F.3d 177 (2d Cir. 2017)(reversing judgment in favor of petitioner and directing verdict in favor of respondent, a young mother of two who suffered a traumatic brain injury after getting struck in the head by metal clip while on board petitioner’s sailboat) Waxman v. Hallen Const. Co. Inc.,139 A.D.3d 597 (1st Dep’t 2016)(reversing order granting defendant’s summary judgment motion which was untimely and where issues of fact whether defendant created dangerous roadway condition that caused plaintiff’s motor scooter crash) Uncyk v. Cedarhurst Prop. Mgmt.,LLC, 137 A.D.3d 610 (1st Dep’t 2016)(reversing order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment where issues of fact as to whether defendant had constructive notice of dangerous sidewalk condition that caused elderly woman’s fall) Nakasato v. 331 W. 51st Corp.,124 A.D.3d 522 (1st Dep’t 2015)(affirming plaintiff’s post-trial motion to set aside jury verdict in favor of defendants on the grounds that verdict represented impermissible compromise) Higgins v. West 50th Street Assoc., LLC, 94 A.D.3d 52. You should contact other lawyers and law firms nearby before choosing your legal representatives.

If you are the owner or employee of Kramer, Dunleavy & Ratchik, PLLC, and want to update the information, please create a new account and then Claim & Edit Kramer, Dunleavy & Ratchik, PLLC. If you want to add your attorney firm, please create a new account.




LawyerDB.org © 2012-2026 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact Us | About Us